Edit 01/19/16: I have modified my original assessment of PC Matic after representatives (including the CEO and VP of Cyber Security) have taken the time to visit Bleeping Computer (see here), explain their product in more detail, answer specific questions and allow some of our members to test it. Since the PC Matic web site did not offer specific details, especially in regards to malware detection and removal...all I had to base my opinion on was the information provided on their web site, the high number of consumer complaints, the high rate of false positive detections and TV commercials.
If you are willing to dig around the PC Matic web site, you eventually will find information about Super Shield, the proprietary real-time technology component to PC Matic. That page also goes into a little more detail about their use of a "white list" (short good list of applications and processes that are authorized to run) approach in addition to a "black list" (long bad list of potential malware). CEO Rob Cheng and other well known security experts explain the benefits of whitelisting, especially in regards to protecting against ransomware.
PC Matic's new VP of Cyber Security (Dodi Glenn) has been in the security industry for over 15 years, was one of the developers of VIPRE and at one time the Product Manager for VIPRE. For those who remember, Sunbelt Software (the vendors who originally made VIPRE and CounterSpy) was among the early pioneers in security development. On January 5, 2016, PC Matic was awarded the ICSA Labs Anti-Virus Certification and they score very high in VVirus Bulletin's Comparative Review for Reactive and Proactive (RAP) tests.
The PC Matic team is in the process of making changes to their web site and provide more information in regards to the security/detection/removal features of their product based on feedback from BC members. From my contact with them, it is apparent that the vendor is more serious-minded than their original TV advertisement would lead some consumers to believe.
While I have reevaluated my original assessment, I am still somewhat skeptical about the high rate of false positives and still do not recommend the use of it's registry cleaning/optimization features (see here). While some of the optimization features are certainly useful (i.e. disk defrag, junk file cleaning, disabling what startups I don't want, etc), I prefer to have manual control of my system by using similar stand-alone products or Windows built-in tools. I would never use or recommend registry cleaning and driver updating utilities in any product, not just PC Matic. However, PC Matic allows you to uncheck any optimization feature you do not want to use as part of it's scan...see the section on Cleaning Options in the PC Matic User Guide.
Dodi explains the high false positive detection rate in this post. When a legitimate program is blocked (a false positive) that the user has attempted to run, they have two options.
- Override the whitelisting technology with seven mouse clicks, or
- Wait 24 hours for proper categorization...the blocked application is automatically sent to PC Matic's malware research team and is tested within 24 hours. It is then categorized as either safe or malicious.
After a year (02/15/17), my revised assessment above is still essentially the same...see my comments in Post #150.
Edit 03/08/17: To address the registry cleaning concerns...PC Matic Removes Registry Cleaning Functionality From Default Scans
.